I think that I would like to change is the following point as documented in the 
header of the PropertyHelper class:
"Object value seems valuable as outlined."

Nicolas

Le 28 juil. 2012 à 19:20, Nicolas Lalevée a écrit :

> 
> Le 28 juil. 2012 à 15:54, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
> 
>> On 2012-07-28, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
>> 
>>> I start to like what I am doing which the AntDSL so I would like to
>>> modify a little bit the Ant API so I can avoid doing so work around.
>> 
>> Sorry, I haven't found the time to play with it.
> 
> No worry.
> Though some completely subjective opinion on the "look&feel" of the language 
> will be appreciated :)
> Anyone ? this is usually a subject for troll :)
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/sandbox/antdsl/trunk/test/build.ant?view=co&revision=1362284&content-type=text%2Fplain&pathrev=1362284
> 
>> 
>>> In AntDSL, I have introduced an expression language so do some basic
>>> computing: some math, some logical computation and string manipulation
>>> for now. It is intended to replace the property expansion in strings.
>> 
>>> Actually, the logical computation is already implemented in Ant: the
>>> Conditions tasks. So I have used them for the if/unless attributes of
>>> the target. I would like to take it back into Ant: [1]. I don't intend
>>> to replace the existing if/unless, just offer new Java API to Target.
>> 
>> I think the props Antlib can already do quite a bit of this.
> 
> Actually I work at different level. See below.
> 
>>> I would also like to be able to have expressions in task
>>> attributes. But Ant assumes these are always Strings. As far as I can
>>> tell, there are two places where it is assumed and it would be
>>> changed: RuntimeConfigurable and IntrospectionHelper. I have been able
>>> to work around RuntimeConfigurable and provide my own
>>> implementation. But IntrospectionHelper is final.
>> 
>> AFAIR this is not totally true, PropertyHelpers can return Objects and
>> they get picked up in the approriate places.  It is true that
>> PropertyHelpers are the only way to generate non-String values outside
>> of IntrospectionHelper, though.  This is rather limiting.
> 
> I am not sure property helper will do the proper job. I have to admit I don't 
> know them much, but as far I can tell, they are sort of String parsers. With 
> Antdsl, the parser has already done the job, I get an instance of the "thing 
> to evaluate", an AntExpression, which can wrap a Condition for instance.
> So when building an UnknownElement, my project helper cannot call 
> RuntimeConfigurable#setAttribute(String, String) like 
> ProjectHelper2.ElementHandler.onStartElement() does, I need a 
> RuntimeConfigurable#setAttribute(String, AntExpression). Thus I would like to 
> introduce a RuntimeConfigurable#setAttribute(String, Object).
> 
> I have also an issue with macros which implement DynamicAttribute. But 
> actually for AntDSL I think the best would be to reimplement the macros, 
> since I am experimenting getting rid of the property expansion, and thus 
> probably name them differently, "function" probably.
> 
>>> I have not a patch to suggest, but I think the change would probably
>>> be about introducing an interface Evaluable, change everywhere from
>>> String to Object, and when we try to get the value of the attribute,
>>> if Evaluable call eval(), otherwise call .toString().
>> 
>> Do you see any chance to unify this with PropertyHelpers?
>> 
>>> The changes I suggest should obviously be backward compatible.
>> 
>> Not so obvious to me.  Aren't there any APIs that return String but
>> would return Object with your changes?
> 
> I think that the API are already returning Object, which is cool. But I would 
> need setter of Object.
> 
> Thank you for your feedback.
> 
> Nicolas
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org

Reply via email to