Hello Matt, I have seen that you started upgrading to Java 5 syntax in the Ant codebase.
I do not see myself going systematically in the codebase to do that because I do not have the time to do it. I will look to see whether there are failures in Gump. I also got some failures running the unit tests in Java 1.7 locally on my Mac, I will need to dig into that and see whether the errors are reproduceable … Regards, Antoine On Jan 31, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > Hi Antoine, > I had made a start towards upgrading to Java 5 syntax in the Ant codebase > some months back. At some point we started getting odd failures in Gump > which I wasn't able to understand. It might be nice to figure this out and > finish the Java 5-ization for 1.9.0. > > br, > Matt > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert <anto...@gmx.de>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would be interested to prepare soon an Ant 1.9.0 release. >> >> In WHATSNEW I see we already have 17 fixed bugs. >> >> Are there other bugs - ideally with patches - that the community needs ? >> >> Also, Jan Matèrne had proposed previously [1] to remove the Perforce Ant >> tasks from Ant due to the availability of better tasks supplied by Perforce. >> >> Now would be a good time to remove them. >> >> Do we need a vote for that ? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Antoine >> >> [1] >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-dev/201012.mbox/%3C000601cb97a0$970bde10$c5239a30$@de%3E --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
