On 2013-03-27, Michael Clarke wrote: >>> * the optional ant-junit4.jar has been merged into ant-junit.jar >>> as Ant now requires JUnit4.
> Is it really the case that Ant requires JUnit4? The changes I > introduced for @Ignore annotations in Ant 1.9.0 shouldn't impact > backwards compatibility with JUnit3 and I don't believe any other > changes in the 1.9.0 release force users to need the JUnit4 jar whilst > running tests. Some classes in the junit package didn't seem to compile in Gump, I think BriefJUnitFormatter was one of them. If you are sure the rest of the package is still supposed to work with JUnit 3.x only - my impression was, it wasn't - then let's revert this. I'll try to free up some time Saturday to see what was going on. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
