On 2013-03-30, Michael Clarke wrote: > https://github.com/mc1arke/ant/commit/63251494ed70b7694305e43c9cc37879ca3bd5adfixes > this, providing CustomJUnit4AdapterCache is moved into the ant-junit4 > JAR. I can make a further commit to reverse the removal of the JUnit4 JAR > and add the CustomJUnit4AdapterCache to the JAR then bundle it up into a > patch if wanted?
I don't really have an opinion myself whether we still want to support JUnit 3.x or not. Nobody else either? We could poll the users list but would likely get the usual mixed bag of "go ahead, JUnit 4 has been available for X years" and "we cannot upgrade for political reasons, JUnit 3 support is essential for us". Given Ant 1.9.0 likely doesn't work with JUnit 3 we may wait a bit and consider the lack of bug reports a sign that JUnit 3 compatibility isn't needed anymore. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
