What is the desired behavior when junit is missing in project classpath ?
1 - ignore test ? maybe with a message @info level ?
2 - configure the plugin to use junit version specified in the project. and
if no one is specified use the one specified by us in the plugin itself ?


2013/4/15 Jean-Louis Boudart <jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com>

> Hi Xavier,
>
> Thanks for your feedback !
>
>
> 2013/4/15 Xavier Hanin <xavier.ha...@gmail.com>
>
>>
>> I've been playing a little bit with easyant 0.9 this wek-end, and I have
>> some feedback:
>> - I have some issues with the multi module example:
>>   - if I run "easyant verify" at the root I get an error: "The <classpath>
>> for <junit> must include junit.jar if not in Ant's own classpath"
>>   - if I run "easyant publish-local" I get another error: "bad revision
>> found in ivy file (Revision: 0.2-local-20130415094618). Use forcedeliver
>> or
>> update"
>>
> Good catch i'll fix this now
>
>
>>
>> - from a documentation point of view, I have not found the documentation
>> of
>> plugins. Having links from the plugins and standard build types pages
>> would
>> be really nice. To change the compiler source and target version I had to
>> check the source files.
>>
>
>
>>
>> - the source files of plugins are pretty easy to read and understand, I
>> think providing links to them or documentation on where to find them would
>> be useful for people used to plain ant (maybe I just missed this part of
>> the doc, I didn't read everything).
>>
> Plugin documentation is not online yet. We didn't took time to find how to
> publish them as we may have differences in future plugin releases.
> We already have a way to generate plugin documentation. Adding links to
> plugin sources could be a good too.
>
>
>> - I've written a small tool to convert basic (very basic I mean) pom files
>> to module.ivy, and the result is interesting: on a bunch of modules, not
>> only the build run perfectly well (it's really nice to use the same
>> conventions), but also it's slightly faster: on a 22 multi module build, a
>> "easyant package" take 19s against 23s for "mvn -DskipTests=true install"
>>
> Nice to hear that it's easy to move from a standard maven build with
> multimodules to easyant. Will you share your tool to convert pom files to
> module.ivy ?
>
>
>>
>> To conclude there's room for improvement, but you've done a very good work
>> especially on the maven compatibility side, which is great for people
>> having a maven build.
>>
> I plan to continue improving support for maven users. In early days of
> easyant we wrote a plugin to emulate maven publication (generating a pom
> and related metadatas) [1] . I saw ivy improvements on makepom task [2] and
> i believe we have work to do on both project to make life easier for maven
> users to reuse publicated artifacts by ivy/easyant.
>
>
>
>
>> For the bugs and documentation improvements, I know I could contrbute
>> myself, but I have to admit I don't have enough time to dedicate.
>>
> No problem :)
>
>
> [1]
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/easyant/plugins/trunk/maven-publication/
> [2] http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/trunk/use/makepom.html
>
> --
> Jean Louis Boudart
> Independent consultant
> Apache EasyAnt commiter http://incubator.apache.org/easyant/
>



-- 
Jean Louis Boudart
Independent consultant
Apache EasyAnt commiter http://incubator.apache.org/easyant/

Reply via email to