Yep, Java9. Have cleaned my environment variables - delete all *JAVA*, *CLASSPATH* variables - shorten PATH to contain only system locations - set JAVA_HOME to Java9 - set PATH=%JAVA_HOME%\bin;%PATH%
java -version gives the Java9-message. Also the changed behaviour of JavaDoc make me think that I got the Java9 ;-) Jan > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Antoine Levy Lambert [mailto:anto...@gmx.de] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. April 2014 04:50 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: Re: JDK 9 build 06 is available on java.net > > Hi, > > On Apr 9, 2014, at 9:55 AM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) <apa...@materne.de> > wrote: > > > I am trying to add the Java9 support. > > First try is building on Java9, which fails due stricter javadoc > checks. > > > > > Yup, I think Stefan had reported too that generating the Javadoc of Ant > also fails under Java 1.8 > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > > > svn-rev 1.585.946 > > Working on Windows 7 > > No optional libs (which doesnt exist in svn) > > Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_22-b03) > > Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_22-b03, mixed mode, sharing) > > > ====================================================================== > > ====== > > > > > . pruning the detailed failures > > ==> not fine, but I dont see a problem for trying Java9 > > > > > Can you download the optional libs using fetch.xml ? and rerun the > tests. > If we have failures due to the absence of the optional libs it should > be possible to correct that. > > > > Regards, > > Antoine > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional > commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
