Le 28 avr. 2014 à 07:29, Jan Matèrne (jhm) <apa...@materne.de> a écrit :
>> Let's vote about migrating to git : >> - Ant > > +1 > >> - Ivy > > +0, because I dont work on that codebase and therefore dont want to > influence these committers. > >> - easyant > > +0, same as for Ivy > > >> - Ivyde > > +0, dito > > >> - the antlibs > > +1 > > > >> I am not including the sandbox in the thread intentionally. > > Why not having one sandbox repo? New projects could be added there as one > directory, if creating a gitmodule would enforce infra to act. What would be the process of a sandbox project becoming "mainstream" with a one for all ? In the "upgrade", we would want a standalone repo for it. Cloning the sandbox would mean having the full history of every other sandbox project in there. Would that work well ? Nicolas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
