That's fine, IvyDE is already at Java 7/Eclipse 3.7.1; then IvyDE baseline should be bumped to Java 8/Eclipse 4.4 with the next Ivy release. Hopefully updatesite resolver could be used then.
2017-05-18 17:12 GMT+02:00 Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>: > Using 1.7 for the next release and then 1.8 for the following release makes > sense to me. > > On 18 May 2017 at 05:58, J Pai <jai.forums2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -Jaikiran > > On 18-May-2017, at 4:26 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) <apa...@materne.de> wrote: > > > > I would favour 1.7 as it's the newest before the major update to Java8. > > Having a 1.7 in the target environment should not been so restrictive ... > > > > Jan > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: Paul King [mailto:pa...@asert.com.au] > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2017 11:27 > > > An: Ant Developers List > > > Betreff: Re: Minimum Java runtime version for proposed upcoming Ivy > > > release > > > > > > The current version of Groovy has 1.6 as the minimum but is our > > > maintenance stream. > > > The upcoming next version will require 1.7 and versions with 1.8 as the > > > minimum are not too far away. > > > > > > Ant 1.9.x is still on Java5 but Ant 1.10.x requires Java 8. > > > > > > I don't think Gradle uses any Ivy classes any more. > > > > > > I'd recommend 1.7 since most active projects will be releasing on > > > 1.7/1.8 and then after a release, if all goes well activity-wise, I'd > > > then bump the Ivy version and target 8. > > > > > > Cheers, Paul. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Nicolas Lalevée > > > <nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> I think that upgrading the requirement on the JDK is a good idea, > > >> because at least us, the maintainers, need at some point to be able > > > to > > >> test it if there is an issue with that minimum JDK. > > >> > > >> One thing to consider is which JDK is being required in the > > >> environment Ivy is being used: Ant, Gradle, SBT, Eclipse, Intellij… > > > We > > >> shouldn’t require too high. > > >> > > >> Nicolas > > >> > > >>> Le 18 mai 2017 à 10:58, J Pai <jai.forums2...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > >>> > > >>> Now that the plan seems to be to release 2.5.x of Ivy, would it be > > >>> fine > > >> if we mandate the _minimum_ Java runtime version to be something > > >> higher than Java 5 that’s currently supported for 2.4.x > > >> http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest- > > > milestone/compatibility.html. > > >>> > > >>> Given that Java 6 itself has long been EOLed, I’m not sure whether > > >>> we > > >> should consider that as minimum supported version or something > > > higher. > > >> Any thoughts? > > >>> > > >>> Things will be a bit more easy to develop and test once we finalize > > >>> on > > >> the Java version. > > >>> > > >>> -Jaikiran > > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > - > > >>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For > > >>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional > > >> commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >
