On 2018-05-03, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > 2018-05-03 11:06 GMT+02:00 Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>:
>> I'm still not sure I understand which benefit you see by retrofitting >> tests that have been written before @Parameterized was invented. They do >> contain way too many asserts in a single test method, but all of them >> pass, so this is somewhat moot as long as neither the test nor the code >> under test is touched :-). > The benefit is clarity of what is being tested. This is why I'm totally in favor of using them for new tests or when adding new testcases to existing tests or when changing code under test. This has not been my question. :-) What is the benefit of changing tests that currently pass when neither the test itself nor the code under test is changed? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
