I'd like to add a Java option to Ivy builds -Dhttps.protocols=TLSv1.2 but I get This job's current authorization strategy does not permit gintas to modify the job configuration
Gintas On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 at 19:09, Gintautas Grigelionis <g.grigelio...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ant nightly is stuck on archiving for 30 hours now. > It should be escalated, I believe that could have something to do with the > last upgrade of Jenkins. > > Gintas > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 at 14:18, Jan Matèrne <j...@materne.de> wrote: > >> Several of our Jenkins builds are failing: >> >> >> >> IvyDE: >> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A/view/Ant/job/IvyDE/ >> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A/view/Ant/job/IvyDE/lastBuild/console >> >> Can't get >> >> http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R3.4.2/R-3.4.2-20130208 >> 151217/wtp4x-R-3.4.2-20130208151217.zip >> <http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R3.4.2/R-3.4.2-20130208151217/wtp4x-R-3.4.2-20130208151217.zip> >> to >> >> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/IvyDE/dependencies/wtp4x-R-3.4.2-20130 >> 208151217.zip >> >> >> >> The source URL gives a 404. >> >> >> >> >> >> AntLib - AntUnit >> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A/view/Ant/job/AntLib-antunit/ >> >> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A/view/Ant/job/AntLib-antunit/lastBuild/conso >> le >> >> [ivy:resolve] Server access error at url >> >> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ant/ant-testutil/1.8.1/ant-testuti >> l-1.8.1.pom >> <https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ant/ant-testutil/1.8.1/ant-testutil-1.8.1.pom> >> (javax.net.ssl.SSLException: Received fatal alert: >> protocol_version) >> >> >> >> >> >> AntLib - SVN >> >> same problem as for AU >> >> >> >> >> >> Ivy >> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A/view/Ant/job/Ivy/ >> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A/view/Ant/job/Ivy/lastBuild/console >> >> same problem as for AU >> >> >> >> >> >> Ant Nightly >> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A/view/Ant/job/Ant_Nightly/ >> >> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A/view/Ant/job/Ant_Nightly/lastBuild/console >> >> all runs fine, but "Archiving artifacts" requires loooot of time … >> >> >> >> >> >> Ideas? >> >> >> >> Jan >> >>