+1
I've been reading up on the CycloneDX standards and other relevant
material. Based on what I have understood so far, this release looks
good to me. One minor suggestion (not for this release, but maybe future
ones) is whether we should use "*.bom.json" as the file/artifact names
instead of the current "*.cyclonedx.json". When I first heard about
cyclonedx it wasn't clear to me what it was, but BOM on the other hand
is a bit more known term. Plus, as per
https://github.com/CycloneDX/specification#recognized-file-patterns ,
"bom.json" is a recognized file pattern for such files. So perhaps we
should consider that name?
-Jaikiran
On 31/05/26 9:42 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
I want to point out
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheant-1070/org/apache/ant/ant-cyclonedx/0.1/ant-cyclonedx-0.1-cyclonedx.json
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/antlibs/cyclonedx/binaries/apache-ant-cyclonedx-0.1-bin-withdeps.tar.bz2.cyclonedx.json
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/antlibs/cyclonedx/binaries/apache-ant-cyclonedx-0.1-bin.tar.bz2.cyclonedx.json
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/antlibs/cyclonedx/source/apache-ant-cyclonedx-0.1-src.tar.bz2.cyclonedx.json
and their XML siblings.
Not only because they've been created by the RC itself, but also because
they are part of the release artifacts.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
