Hi Lewis, Sounds good. I have added more mime types to TIKA-1208 , including RDF-1.1 and SPARQL-1.1 formats, along with the Sesame Binary RDF format.
Cheers, Peter On 13 December 2013 05:58, Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Folks, > I managed to put some time in to the proposal document we promised a while > back. > Right now there is lots of background (which I think is equally as > important as the migration itself) and I have identified the first area > which work can begin on e.g. mime/mediatype detection. > > I opened TIKA-1207 [0] as a parent task to track everything, I've also > attached a .txt document there so folks can track a more verbose account of > whats being proposed and the progress being made. > > @Tika Dev's > It was previously proposed (I think) that a branch of the trunk codebase > would be used to merge in changes... it is however my suggestion that this > may not be necessary. Everything we propose within this initiative can be > classified as *additions* to the codebase... therefore we don't need to > worry about backwards compatibility or breaking trunk for the masses. > It is therefore my suggestion that we simply review and address child > issues, submit patches for Tika trunk, then go back to the review of the > Any23 codebase and carry on with the proposed migration of code. > > Does anyone have any comments on this right now before we go ahead with > making the patches for TIKA-1208? > > Thank you very much > Lewis > > [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1207 > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1208 > > -- > *Lewis*
