> > > > > Malhar in its current state, has way too many operators that fall in the > > "non-production quality" category. We should make it obvious to users > that > > which operators are up to par, and which operators are not, and maybe > even > > remove those that are likely not ever used in a real use case. > > > > I am ambivalent about revisiting older operators and doing this exercise as > this can cause unnecessary tensions. My original intent is for > contributions going forward. > > IMO it is important to address this as well. Operators outside the play area should be of well known quality.
Thomas
