I'm good with shading it internally in apex-engine for now until there is an actual need in a real use case. Thanks!
David On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Pramod Immaneni <[email protected]> wrote: > Good question. Even though it would be useful for somebody wanting to use > SPNEGO in their operator for example I don't see any immediate use. We can > just go with it being internal and create a separate artifact in future if > need arises. What do you think? > > Thanks > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 11:40 AM, David Yan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 for the change. This would fix dependency conflicts between httpclient > > 4.2.5 and 4.3.5. > > I think the question is whether we should publish a separate shaded > > artifact (like we did for ning-ahc) for the shaded httpclient 4.3.5, or > > just shading it internally in apex-engine. The former allows application > > and operator developers to use the shaded artifact and the latter hides > it > > completely. > > > > Davod > > > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pramod Immaneni <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > Forgot to add that 4.3.5 is a later version that what newer versions of > > > hadoop are using (4.2.5) and we need it for kerberos SPNEGO security > > > related functionality. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Pramod Immaneni < > [email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > We have seen an issue with different versions of > > > > org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient jar getting included in > classpath > > > when > > > > apps are launched on newer versions of Hadoop. This is because we > have > > an > > > > explicit dependency in Apex to version 4.3.5, the version of hadoop > we > > > > build against (2.2 for backward compatibility) does not have a > > dependency > > > > to this artifact but newer versions of hadoop have this dependency. > To > > > get > > > > around this problem we are thinking of shading this dependency > > internally > > > > in apex. Any other ideas or suggestions? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > >
