Strong +1 from me as well (both points 1&2). On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 2:38 PM, David Yan <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm strong +1 for Pramod's suggestion. > > David > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Pramod Immaneni <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I was wondering how everyone felt about the volume of auto-generated > emails > > on this list. Looks like multiple emails are generated and sent to > everyone > > on the list even for relatively smaller actions such as commenting on a > > pull request, one from git, another from JIRA etc. > > > > Understanding that there is a need for openness, how about finding a > > balance. Here are some ideas. I do not know if all of these are > technically > > feasible. > > > > 1. An email is sent to all in the list when a new pull request is created > > or merged but email notifications for back and forth comments during the > > review are only sent to participants in that particular pull request. > > 2. Similar process as above with JIRA. If someone is interested in all > the > > updates to JIRA, including those that come from the pull request, they > can > > add themselves to the watch list for that particular JIRA. > > > > Thanks > > >
