I would agree with Milind. Regards, Mohit
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Milind Barve <mili...@gmail.com> wrote: > Additionally, this would apply to Stram as well i.e. the master should also > not be deployed on these nodes. Not sure if anti-affinity goes beyond > operators. > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Milind Barve <mili...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > My previous mail explains it, but just forgot to add : -1 to cover this > > under anti affinity. > > > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Milind Barve <mili...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> While it is possible to extend anti-affinity to take care of this, I > feel > >> it will cause confusion from a user perspective. As a user, when I think > >> about anti-affinity, what comes to mind right away is a relative > relation > >> between operators. > >> > >> On the other hand, the current ask is not that, but a relation at an > >> application level w.r.t. a node. (Further, we might even think of > extending > >> this at an operator level - which would mean do not deploy an operator > on a > >> particular node) > >> > >> We would be better off clearly articulating and allowing users to > >> configure it seperately as against using anti-affinity. > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Bhupesh Chawda < > bhup...@datatorrent.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Okay, I think that serves an alternate purpose of detecting any newly > >>> gone > >>> bad node and excluding it. > >>> > >>> +1 for covering the original scenario under anti-affinity. > >>> > >>> ~ Bhupesh > >>> > >>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Munagala Ramanath <r...@datatorrent.com > > > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > It only takes effect after failures -- no way to exclude from the > >>> get-go. > >>> > > >>> > Ram > >>> > > >>> > On Dec 1, 2016 7:15 PM, "Bhupesh Chawda" <bhup...@datatorrent.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > As suggested by Sandesh, the parameter > >>> > > MAX_CONSECUTIVE_CONTAINER_FAILURES_FOR_BLACKLIST seems to do > exactly > >>> > what > >>> > > is needed. > >>> > > Why would this not work? > >>> > > > >>> > > ~ Bhupesh > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ~Milind bee at gee mail dot com > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > ~Milind bee at gee mail dot com > > > > > > -- > ~Milind bee at gee mail dot com >
