I don't think that we can use VersionEye maven plugin as it requires JDK 1.8 at the build time. The other plugin looks promising. I don't have experience working with it either, can you try and submit a PR if it provides the required functionality.

Thank you,

Vlad

On 11/1/17 12:34, Ananth G wrote:
I was wondering if we can consider a maven plugin or some other approach in an 
automated way that might help us get to avoiding the current situation we have 
with respect to Category X license..


What are our thoughts on :

- Integrating with a VersionEye OR  equivalent stack wherein we use a version 
eye maven plugin to check for whitelisted / blacklisted licenses maintained in 
a version eye server
- If answer is yes,  is there an ASF server that we can use for our builds ?
- There seems to be a maven plugin that might do this but I have not used it before. 
Does anyone have any opinion on https://github.com/mrice/license-check 
<https://github.com/mrice/license-check> ?

Also what is our policy for undeclared licenses in the dependencies ? There is 
the license-maven-plugin from codehaus that lists these as “THIRD-PARTY” 
dependencies and can generate a report ( but cannot be used to break a build if 
a category x license is introduced as a PR )


Regards,
Ananth


On 2 Nov 2017, at 6:10 am, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org> wrote:

It does not matter whether sql (and demos) is part of the main profile or not. 
It is a source release, not a binary release and source includes all profiles.

Thank you,

Vlad

On 11/1/17 11:50, Pramod Immaneni wrote:
Vlad can you add this command to the release instructions and the committer
guidelines. If we are unable to address this for this release, we can
consider moving examples to all-modules, sql is already not in the main
profile.

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org> wrote:

The following command may help to identify dependencies:

find . -name DEPENDENCIES -print | xargs grep -n License: | grep -vE
"Apache|CDDL|MIT|BSD|ASF|Public Domain|Eclipse Public License|Mozilla
Public|Common Public|apache.org"

Thank you,

Vlad

On 10/28/17 20:19, Ananth G wrote:

Before we proceed with the release, could I please get some thoughts on
the following JIRAs that need resolution. If we can move some of these out
of 3.8.0 to the next release , then I can proceed with the release
instructions.

There are two JIRAs that are marked 3.8.0 and not yet resolved:

- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2461 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2461> (This is the one
that Vlad raised below about Category X dependencies )
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2498 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2498> (Kafka Tests
being flaky )

The following is marked as “In progress”
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2462 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2462> : This I believe
was kept in progress by Thomas for some follow up tasks and hence I believe
we can move it to post 3.8.0 release ?


@Vlad: Regarding APEXMALHAR-2461, How are you generating the license
reports ? I have tried using license-maven-plugin ( from codehaus ) and it
does generate a report but there is nothing which provides a report based
on the violations ( and hence being forced to open each project under
examples and comparing it with the licenses list from the allowed licenses
link that you provided in the mailing list a few days back). Is there a
more optimal way to see the current list of violations in a concise way ?

Regards,
Ananth

On 27 Oct 2017, at 5:53 am, Tushar Gosavi <tus...@datatorrent.com> wrote:
Hi Vlad,

As far as I remember, I had access to staging maven area while doing
previous apex release. You will need to update .m2/settings.xml with
apache
credential to access the maven repository.

Regards,
-Tushar.


On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org> wrote:

Please send your PGP public key to one of PMC members to be added to
KEYS.
I don't remember if only PMC have access to staging Apache maven, it
may be
the case. Tushar, did you have write access to the staging Apache maven
when you did the release?

What do we do with https://issues.apache.org/jira
/browse/APEXMALHAR-2461?

Thank you,

Vlad


On 10/25/17 15:28, Ananth G wrote:

I would like to volunteer to be the release manager for this. Given I
have not done this before I might have a few questions along the way
in the
mailing list.

A couple of questions regarding the release process:

- In the link https://apex.apache.org/release.html , in the section
titled “Build and deploy release candidate” there is a mention of
adding
GPG keys.
          - Is it mandatory for the release manager gpg public key to be
present in the list
          - If it is how do I get my key added to that list
- In the same section of the above link there is a mention of
configuring
the server apache.staging.https in the maven settings file.
          - I am not able to reach this server ? Is this expected?
          - The userid and password to be configured are our committer
ids
?

Regards
Ananth

On 26 Oct 2017, at 4:04 am, Ananth G <ananthg.a...@gmail.com> wrote:

+1 for malhar release.


Regards,
Ananth

On 26 Oct 2017, at 3:20 am, Bhupesh Chawda <bhup...@datatorrent.com>

wrote:

+1 for malhar release

~ Bhupesh


_______________________________________________________

Bhupesh Chawda

E: bhup...@datatorrent.com | Twitter: @bhupeshsc

www.datatorrent.com  |  apex.apache.org



On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <
chin...@datatorrent.com>
wrote:

+1.

- Chinmay.

On 25 Oct 2017 9:20 pm, "Chaitanya Chebolu" <
chaita...@datatorrent.com
wrote:

+1 on new release.

Thanks,

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org>

wrote:

+1.

Thank you,

Vlad


On 10/25/17 08:21, Amol Kekre wrote:

+1 on a new malhar release.

Thks,
Amol


E:a...@datatorrent.com | M: 510-449-2606 | Twitter:
@*amolhkekre*

www.datatorrent.com


On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Tushar Gosavi <

tus...@datatorrent.com>
wrote:

+1 on creating a new malhar release.
- Tushar.
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 4:39 AM, Pramod Immaneni <

pra...@datatorrent.com
wrote:

+1 on creating a new release. I, unfortunately, do not have the
time

currently to participate in the release activities.
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org>

wrote:
The last release was back in March, there are quite a few JIRAs
that

have
been completed since and should be released.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%
20%3D%203.8.0%20AND%20project%20%3D%20APEXMALHAR%20ORDER%
20BY%20status%20ASC

  From looking at the list there is nothing that should stand
in
the

way
of a
release?
Also, once the release is out it would be a good opportunity
to

effect
the
major version change.
Anyone interested to be the release manager?

Thanks,
Thomas



--
*Chaitanya*

Software Engineer

E: chaita...@datatorrent.com | Twitter: @chaithu1403

www.datatorrent.com  |  apex.apache.org





Reply via email to