I too think that a comprehensive UI works better standalone but given that
stram already runs a webapp server, provides web services and RM provides a
proxy with mapped url space for it, we can extend stram to provide better
visual output. Overall I am +1 on the idea.

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 8:59 AM Vlad Rozov <vro...@apache.org> wrote:

> Clarification: I am -0 on making UI part of the stram. I am +1 on
> providing reference webUI application outside of the stram.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Vlad
>
> On 6/9/18 07:05, Vlad Rozov wrote:
> > -0: stram provides REST API to query runtime information and IMO this
> > is sufficient to build an external webUI application(s).
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Vlad
> >
> > On 6/6/18 11:17, Ambarish Pande wrote:
> >> +1 For this feature. It would be really helpfull for users to
> >> visualize all
> >> this information  and the DAG.
> >>
> >> +1 for ReactJS + MaterialUI
> >>   A great choice, given  its flexibility and performance.
> >>
> >> I would like to contribute to this effort.
> >>
> >> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 at 8:13 PM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <chin...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Community,
> >>>
> >>> I want to propose a feature in apex-core to have a UI component in
> >>> stram.
> >>> This is influenced by how basic runtime information is shown on UI by
> >>> spark.
> >>>
> >>> This includes following features:
> >>> 1. Webpage will be hosted by stram and will be available for user to
> >>> view
> >>> in one of the two ways (I'll prefer approach b):
> >>>     a. Hosted on a static port in which case we'll need to add a new
> >>> servlet
> >>> to stram
> >>>     b. The webpage will be hosted on the same port as that of stram
> >>> webservice but at a different path. Say, http://
> >>> <stram_host>:<webservice_port>/ui
> >>>
> >>> 2. The webpage will be a static page and depending on the framework we
> >>> chose, it can show the realtime metric data from stram.
> >>>
> >>> 3. There will be a categories of readonly information (maybe
> >>> dynamically
> >>> changing) that will be shown on the UI:
> >>>     a. Application level information
> >>>         i. Status
> >>>         ii. Number of tuples processed/emitted
> >>>         iii. Start time/ Running span
> >>>         iv. Stram events
> >>>         v. Total memory used/available
> >>>         vi. Number of container allocated/deployed
> >>>         v. Other information which is available in stram
> >>>     b. Logical Operator level information
> >>>         i. Status
> >>>         ii. Number of tuples processed/emitted
> >>>         iii. Important events related to logical operator
> >>>         iv. Container list in which the operator is deployed
> >>>         v. Any other information available in stram
> >>>         vi. Logical DAG View
> >>>     c. Container level information
> >>>         i. Status
> >>>         ii. Number of tuples processed/emitted
> >>>         iii. Important events related to logical operator
> >>>         iv. Any other information available in stram
> >>>         v. Physical DAG View
> >>>
> >>> 4. In second phase, there will be control related operations allowed
> >>> from
> >>> the UI, as follows:
> >>>     a. Stop/Kill application
> >>>     b. Stop/Kill containers
> >>>     c. Stack trace dump of containers
> >>>     d. Logs related?
> >>>     d. etc...??
> >>>
> >>> The above implementation can be done in phases as follows:
> >>> 1. Have webpage display application level information only (read-only).
> >>> Static display first (i.e. page needs to refresh to see latest
> >>> data), next
> >>> dynamically changing data.
> >>> 2. Have jenkins build tools updated as needed by UI framework.
> >>> 3. Update the backend (stram) to serve the UI pages
> >>> 3. Extend the webage to display logical operator information.
> >>> 4. Extend the webage to display physical operator information
> >>> 5. Implement control operations on UI.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> To implement above functionality, I propose ReactJS as UI framework and
> >>> MaterialUI (based on Google's material design) for theme/controls/CSS
> >>> support.
> >>>
> >>> Please let me know what you think about the same.
> >>>
> >>> Also, please let know if anyone is interested in contributing to this
> >>> feature.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Chinmay.
> >>>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to