Clean up container files left over should be a distributed OS task. Clean up, back up, archive, ... all is for the OS (aka YARN). We must assume kill -9.
The only thing where the operator comes into play is "teardown()", which is business logic (not Apex engine) issue. This could be db connection etc. Thks, Amol On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> wrote: > When the container gets killed, we should not assume anything about > cleanup. It can be a kill -9. Any related "cleanup" falls under nice to > have, no guarantees. > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Chandni Singh <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I have a question regarding what Gaurav mentioned > > ---- > > When container runs in cluster, "." specifies the containers local path > on > > the node where container specific jars and other resources resides. It > > creates a folder under that which is live as long as container lives. So > > there are no vagrant folders anywhere > > --- > > > > When the container gets killed, do we cleanup the folders created by > Async > > under the containers working dir? > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> It makes sense to use the synchronous checkpointing for the local mode. > >> LM is meant to simplify dependencies and setup. The default for > execution > >> on YARN remains async. > >> > >> Thomas > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Chandni Singh <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> APPLICATION_PATH isn't related to local base dir of Async as far as I > >>> know. StramLocalCluster sets the APP_PATH to "target/...". > >>> StramLocalCluster should use FSStorageAgent. > >>> > >>> - Chandni > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Gaurav Gupta <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> As Thomas mentioned as default remains to be async. You can either > >>>> change the storage agent or set the APPLICATION_PATH. > >>>> > >>>> When container runs in cluster, "." specifies the containers local > path > >>>> on the node where container specific jars and other resources > resides. It > >>>> creates a folder under that which is live as long as container lives. > So > >>>> there are no vagrant folders anywhere > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> -Gaurav > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Chandni Singh < > [email protected] > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I think there is a problem in the default Async as well. It also uses > >>>>> the working directory as its local base path. > >>>>> > >>>>> In the Async -> copyToHdfs() method, we delete the window files but > >>>>> the folder with the operator name never gets deleted. > >>>>> So on the cluster there will be such vagrant folders in the working > >>>>> directory? > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Thomas Weise < > [email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Chandni, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Agreed. See whether the tests work with the synchronous storage > >>>>>> agent. If yes, change them. The default needs to remain async. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thomas > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Chandni Singh < > >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I would like to know what was the reason to use AsyncFSStorageAgent > >>>>>>> with StramLocalCluster? > >>>>>>> StramLocalCluster is mainly for testing in a non-distributed mode > >>>>>>> and I am unclear how AsyncFSStorageAgent is helpful in this mode. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> Chandni > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Chandni Singh < > >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> This is because of recent changes to StramLocalCluster where > >>>>>>>> AsyncFSStorageAgent is used for checkpointing > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> dag.setAttribute(OperatorContext.STORAGE_AGENT, new > AsyncFSStorageAgent(new Path(pathUri, > LogicalPlan.SUBDIR_CHECKPOINTS).toString(), null)); > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The AsyncFSStorageAgent(String path, Configuration conf) uses "." > as localBasePath and therefore creates sub-directories per operator in the > current working directory. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I am going to create a ticket to address this and will fix it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -Chandni > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Chandni Singh < > >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I can see empty folders getting created under Malhar/lib called > >>>>>>>>> '1' and '2'. > >>>>>>>>> I think this is because of using LocalMode to run a test > >>>>>>>>> application. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> If anyone has checked in such cases please do check and let us > >>>>>>>>> know. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>> Chandni > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > >
