Promod,

You are right about applying the value in same window. And yes I don't want
to change number of partitions or even redeploy any partition for this.
I need to explore on Chandini's suggestion of using StatsListener.

-Priyanka

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Pramod Immaneni <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I am not sure about priyanka's requirements but typically you would want to
> apply the value in the same window for all partitions for consistency with
> the calculations. This could be done two ways using a separate logical
> operator feeding the value to all partitions so that the value appears in
> the same window or repartitioning the existing set and setting the value
> during repartitioning. In the latter case you are just repartitioning so
> that the partitions start from same point with the new value and not to
> change the number of partitions.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Chandni Singh <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Pramod,
> >
> > Tim's discussion was about setting a property on multiple operators
> > (different logical operators).
> > Priyanka's question is about different partitions of an operator
> >
> > Let's say they are 5 partitions of an operator and we need to change an
> int
> > property.  There are following ways:
> >
> > 1. Divide the int property by 5 and issue set-physical operator property
> > command for each partition. This is manual.
> >
> > 2. Set the logical operator property but wait till partition happens.
> This
> > will require partitioning to be triggered for which a StatsListener needs
> > to be implemented. So if partitioning never happens this will never be
> > triggered. Also un-deploying and deploying a partition just to change a
> > property on the physical partition seems un-necessary
> >
> > 3. Implementing StatsListener to send operator request and not
> re-partition
> > seems to be appropriate way.
> >
> > Chandni
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Pramod Immaneni <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Priyanka you want to divide the value among existing partitions right
> and
> > > not necessarily change the number of partitions. To this end Ashwin is
> > > suggesting makes sense. However different partitions can be at
> different
> > > windows and will see the value change in different windows. You need a
> > > separate operator to receive this change and propagate it to the
> > partitions
> > > via data flow. Tim discussed this over the last weekend in a series of
> > > emails.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Priyanka Gugale <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for suggestions.
> > > >
> > > > Ashwin, The option you proposed is doable, but then each operator
> which
> > > > needs to address such use case will have to track the number of
> > > partitions.
> > > > So we were looking for some common mechanism.
> > > > Chandni, Let me try the res.operatorRequests, that could solve the
> > > problem.
> > > >
> > > > -Priyanka
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Chandni Singh <
> > [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Priyanka,
> > > > >
> > > > > As Isha mentioned you will can implement a StatsListener. However
> > > instead
> > > > > of setting res.repartitionRequired = true, you can add a
> > > > > StatsListener.OperatorRequest to res.operatorsRequests. This will
> not
> > > > > re-deploy the instances.
> > > > >
> > > > > The OperatorRequest that you will need to implement will have to
> > change
> > > > the
> > > > > property value.
> > > > >
> > > > > You can refer to AutoMetricTest for an example.
> > > > >
> > > > > - Chandni
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Ashwin Chandra Putta <
> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Why not maintain a variable containing the number of partitions
> in
> > > each
> > > > > > partition; and when you set the property, just divide it by
> number
> > of
> > > > > > partitions variable? Does it not solve the problem?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Ashwin.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Priyanka Gugale <
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have an integer property named "intProp". This property is
> > > > applicable
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > an operator A. I can set the property from dtcli using
> > > > > > > "set-operator-property operator-name property-name
> > property-value"
> > > > and
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > will get applied to all instances of opeartor A.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now, I want to apply this property in a way that it's equally
> > > divided
> > > > > > > amongst all instances of operator A. For example,  if
> intProp=100
> > > and
> > > > > > > number of partitions=4 then intProp=25 should be set on each
> > > instance
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > operator A.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is there a way to achieve this?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have tried following approach to do this: I have overriden
> > > > > > > definePartitions of Operator, once we do partitioning I am
> > setting
> > > > > right
> > > > > > > value on each operator instance based on new partition count.
> The
> > > > > > > limitation here is that the value is applied during
> > > definePartitions.
> > > > > If
> > > > > > > the value is updated dynamically it won't be applied till
> > > > > > definePartitions
> > > > > > > is called again.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Priyanka
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Ashwin.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to