+1

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Bright Chen <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
> Bright
>
> > On Oct 26, 2015, at 9:34 AM, David Yan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Ran all unit tests and launched pi-demo.  Looks good.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Pramod Immaneni <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear Community,
> >>>
> >>> We incorporated the feedback from RC1 and would like to start a new
> vote.
> >>>
> >>> Please vote on the following Apache Apex Core 3.2.0-incubating release
> >>> candidate.
> >>>
> >>> This is the first release of the project since incubation.
> >>>
> >>> This is a source release.
> >>>
> >>> List of all issues fixed: http://s.apache.org/SRM
> >>>
> >>> Staged artifacts:
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheapex-1001/
> >>> Source zip:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/apex/v3.2.0-incubating-RC2/apex-3.2.0-incubating-source-release.zip
> >>> Source tar.gz:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/apex/v3.2.0-incubating-RC2/apex-3.2.0-incubating-source-release.tar.gz
> >>>
> >>> Git source:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-apex-core.git;a=commit;h=refs/tags/v3.2.0-incubating-RC2
> >>>  (commit: d61ca617fd44bf9d74800838341f92018f2c7d10)
> >>>
> >>> PGP key:
> >>> *http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&[email protected]
> >>> <http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&[email protected]>*
> >>>
> >>> More information at:
> >>> http://apex.incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please try the release and vote; vote will be open for at least 72
> hours.
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>
> >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> >>>
> >>> Please add (binding) if your vote is binding.
> >>>
> >>> Please indicate what testing or verification was performed, especially
> >> for
> >>> binding votes.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Thomas
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to