+1 for avoiding large monolithic functions and I think if the effort is
already done to break an existing hard-to-understand function then we
should merge that change (provided it passes all the checks).

I think writing functions that are not monolithic cannot be enforced by any
tool. We can create a document that lays down certain guide lines but other
than that this needs to be part of code review process.

Thanks,
Chandni


On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Ganelin, Ilya <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello all – in doing some refactoring of the code base, I’ve noticed that
> there are several large functions (several screens in length) with numerous
> nested calls (as many as five deep). While there are no explicit guidelines
> in the code style guide or in other common guidelines, it seems to be good
> programming practice to avoid large monolithic functions since these become
> harder to analyze and maintain. To that end, I submitted a PR to refactor
> one such function but this triggered discussion as to whether it’s
> warranted to do this in the first place. Would love to get people’s
> thoughts as to whether this is a good idea and if so, how could we update
> the style guide to reflect this requirement?
>
> The PR is below:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/129#issuecomment-153807144
> ________________________________________________________
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
> proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
> solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information
> transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity
> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any
> action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and
> delete the material from your computer.
>

Reply via email to