Nice.

Thks
Amol

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Timothy Farkas <[email protected]> wrote:

> Nice benchmark Ram.
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Munagala Ramanath <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I was curious about this so I wrote a couple of small standalone
> > programs, one using the loopback
> > interface and one using ArrayBlockingQueue to send byte arrays from
> > one thread to another.
> >
> > The loopback version is about 50% slower than the ArrayBlockingQueue:
> >
> > Reader: read 4000000 tuples of size 128 in 3893 ms
> (ArrayBlockingQueue)
> > Writer: wrote 4000000 tuples of size 128 in 3893 ms
> >
> > Writer: wrote 4000000 tuples of size 128 in 5783 ms    (Loopback)
> > Reader: read 4000000 tuples of size 128 in 5820 ms
> >
> > Ram
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Isha Arkatkar <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >    For APEX-259 (https://malhar.atlassian.net/browse/APEX-259), I am
> > > exploring option of passing serialized tuples from publisher to buffer
> > > server through a blocking queue.
> > >
> > > Right now, publisher and buffer server reside within the same
> container,
> > > however, communication between the two goes though sockets. We want to
> > > check if we get any performance benefit by changing this communication
> to
> > > queue-based one.
> > >
> > > This is in exploration phase right now, but if we do see improvement,
> we
> > > may want to provide it as a pluggable option.
> > >
> > > Please let me know your thoughts!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Isha
> >
>

Reply via email to