>
>Until we have this, how about we restore the previous behavior
>temporarily?
>Calling checkpointed() immediately does not seem to pose any practical
>issue but ensures that the code that was written under this assumption is
>not broken.

We can¹t do it. It would be incorrect. It breaks all the other code that
(unassumingly) correctly complied to the semantics. e.g. an operator which
informs interesting parties that the checkpointed data is available for
immediate consumption from storage.

‹
Chetan

Reply via email to