+1 on making it a feature for all output operators that depend on external
system

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Sandeep Deshmukh <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 on making it apex feature.
> On 29-Mar-2016 12:22 pm, "Tushar Gosavi" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 for the idea, love to have this feature available for operators
> writing
> > to external systems.
> >
> > - Tushar.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ashwin,
> > >
> > > This is indeed a very required functionality.
> > >
> > > I think this is applicable for all three types of operators: Input
> (e.g.
> > > HDFSInput, JDBCInput, etc), Process (e.g. Enrichment), Output
> > (JDBCOutput,
> > > HDFSOutput, etc)
> > >
> > > I tried to do something similar:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/chinmaykolhatkar/incubator-apex-malhar/blob/APEXMALHAR-1963_AsyncProcessor/library/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/lib/async/AbstractAsyncProcessor.java
> > >
> > > But this had limitation related extending another class other than this
> > > abstract class etc....
> > >
> > > From what you have mentioned above, I see the functionality basically
> > > provides asynchronous processing of tuples.
> > >
> > > Considering this is a common functionality, Can this feature instead be
> > > added in platform (apex-core) itself?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Chinmay.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Mohit Jotwani <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear Ashwin,
> > > >
> > > > The approach sounds good. I am assuming that this will be done for
> all
> > > the
> > > > output data stores and not limited to JDBC.
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Mohit
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Ashwin Chandra Putta <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > There are many use cases in which we are writing tuples to external
> > > > system
> > > > > using JDBC etc. There are instances when the external system might
> be
> > > > slow
> > > > > and down for some time. In those cases, the current implementation
> of
> > > > jdbc
> > > > > output operators fail and restart until the external system is up
> > > again.
> > > > > Meanwhile, the DAG is slowed down by this operator. To deal with
> such
> > > > > scenarios, we should write the output in a reconciled fashion where
> > the
> > > > > reconciler thread is writing at the pace of external system. We
> > should
> > > > also
> > > > > provide an ability to spool the data to disk when the external
> system
> > > is
> > > > > down or the output operators queue is full.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here are the proposed features for the output operator.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Write to external system in a separate reconciler thread.
> > > > > 2. Queue the tuples in memory for reconciler thread to consume.
> > > > > 3. Spool the incoming tuples to hdfs using a WAL when the queue is
> > > full.
> > > > > 4. Read from WAL and write to queue as queue is being consumed.
> > > > > 5. When external system is able to consume as fast as incoming
> > > > throughput,
> > > > > WAL is not written. The queue will just buffer the tuples before
> > > writing
> > > > to
> > > > > external system.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is the JIRA:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2037
> > > > >
> > > > > Please let me know if you have any feedback on the design.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Ashwin.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to