[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15255642#comment-15255642
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-439:
-----------------------------------------

Github user amberarrow commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/314#discussion_r60847135
  
    --- Diff: 
engine/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/stram/plan/physical/PhysicalPlan.java ---
    @@ -979,6 +998,14 @@ public void deployChanges() {
         this.undeployOpers.removeAll(newOpers.keySet());
    --- End diff --
    
    If I understand @tweise correctly, he is suggesting that the existing code 
be augmented _only_ by the highlighted fragment below (since he says "remove 
everything added new"):
    
    {code}
        updatePartitionsInfoForPersistOperator(this.dag);
    
        /* begin new code */
        // redeploy dependencies of the new operators excluding the new 
operators themselves
        this.undeployOpers.addAll(getDependents(newOpers.keySet()));
        /* end new code */
    
        this.undeployOpers.removeAll(newOpers.keySet());
        //make sure all the new operators are included in deploy operator list
        this.deployOpers.addAll(this.newOpers.keySet());
        // include downstream dependencies of affected operators into redeploy
        Set<PTOperator> deployOperators = this.getDependents(this.deployOpers);
        ctx.deploy(releaseContainers, this.undeployOpers, newContainers, 
deployOperators);
    {code}
    
    This works for _undeployOpers_ since the argument set (newOpers) is removed 
just after the new code. However, this change alone does not add dependents to 
_deployOpers_ as the proposed fix does -- not sure if this makes a difference.


> After dynamic repartition application appears blocked
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: APEXCORE-439
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-439
>             Project: Apache Apex Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0
>            Reporter: Munagala V. Ramanath
>            Assignee: Munagala V. Ramanath
>
> When a file input operator (subclass of AbstractFileInputOperator) is 
> dynamically repartitioned, some downstream unifiers are not identified as 
> needing to be redeployed causing the window id to not advance and all 
> downstream operators to be killed and restarted.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to