* Ennio-Sr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [110605, 00:56]:
> * Ennio-Sr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [100605, 19:47]:
> > * Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [100605, 18:21]:
> > > Hi again
> > >
> > > i am totally wrong sorry
> > It's me to be sorry for not being able to figure out what this means ;)
> > >
> > > subRegExpressions
> > > [...]
>
> Hi Laurent,
>
> no matter what that IDL description might mean, Paolo's code with your
> integration, once you substitute "[:alnum:]+" for "[:digit:]+" and
> separate the items to be searched with a '\',e.g:
> "this \will \be \found \in \Paolo \test \text \333 \654\"]
> works very smoothly :-)))
>
> Now, the only missing feature is an inter-active dialog box where to put
> the string(s) to be searched for: Paolo ....... ?
>
> Thanks again to both of you,
> Ennio.
Again me (hoping not to be talking to myself... ;-)
I found the way to use sStrToSearch = inputBox(" .....") and while
testing with many other strings I realized the reverse strokes '\' don't
seem to be necessary, although I canot tell why I reported this
impression during my first attempts ;(.
A further step would seem to be the capability to replace the found items
with new ones ? (But I have no idea where to start looking for ...)
Lonely yours, ;)
Ennio
--
[Perche' usare Win$ozz (dico io) se ..."anche uno sciocco sa farlo. \\?//
Fa' qualche cosa di cui non sei capace!" (diceva Henry Miller) ] (�|�)
[Why use Win$ozz (I say) if ... "even a fool can do that. )=(
Do something you aren't good at!" (as Henry Miller used to say) ]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
