Hi Rony,
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi there,
while working a little bit with the reflection interface I have been
stumbling over the following: "com.sun.star.reflection.XField" is
deprecated in favor of "com.sun.star.reflection.XField2". All signatures
are the same except for set(), where the first argument changed from
[in] to [inout].
You can see XField2 as version 2 of this interface. We haven't a
mechanism of versioning for interface which is of course bad but it
depends on technical reasons (we can't support two versions of an Java
interface in the same VM for example)
Now, if I am only interested in the method getType(), returning an
XIdlClass, am I really supposed to query explicitly for the XField2
interface? Or with other words: would it be o.k. to use the returned
XField as long as one is not using the set()-method?
It will probably work all the time but the correct way would be to use
XField2.
Juergen
TIA,
---rony
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
