Paolo Mantovani wrote:

> Hi Mathias,
> 
> Alle 22:25, lunedì 20 febbraio 2006, Mathias Bauer ha scritto:
> [...]
>> It doesn't make any sense to record a S&R action that does not
>> automatically replace all occurences or no occurence and asks the user
>> for every single case.
>>
>> A macro that e.g. only replaces the 3rd and the 5th occurence can't be
>> applied to other documents in a useful way. 
> 
> I agree, but actually the user *can* record such actions, even if it doesn't 
> make sense.

So the question remains wether these macros are a good candidate for
investing time in making them "better". ;-)

>> So what you need is "Replace
>> All" and "Start Replacing and ask me each time". AFAIK the latter is
>> possible only by dispatching because it's bound to a dialog while the
>> S&R API of the "core" document explicitly is designed to avoid dialog
>> interruptions.
> 
> I'm not sure to understand you:
> If you record a S&R (in Calc) with the macro-recorder you will see 
> that each time that you will press one of the 4 buttons available on the S&R 
> dialog:
>       Find
>       Find all
>       Replace
>       Replace all
> 
> a dispatch ".uno:ExecuteSearch" will be recorded.

Yes, that's what happens, but I'm not very fond of it. Sorry, I was not
clear enough when I described how I think S&R can be automated.

I think that recording specific S&R actions in general is useless. The
only S&R actions that are applicable in a general way are "Replace all",
"Start searching and ask me wether the found text should be replaced
until no more occurences are found or I stop it" and "Search and replace
the next occurence of this text". So recording a single "Replace" is
useful, but having a *combined* macro that contains several
"ExecuteSearch" steps where some of them replaced the text and some
didn't is useless: you can't apply it to any other text than the one you
recorded it for (except some very rare cases).

> My problem is actually only the case SearchItem.Command=2 (replace first)
> because I've not a direct API "traslation" for this command.

Yes, I understood, sorry for not answering to this directly: I don't
know how to accomplish that. Perhaps Oliver Specht has an idea, I will
ask him.

Best regards,
Mathias

-- 
Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead
Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to