On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 18:29 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: > G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > > Actually I think he reacted so strongly to my comment on the component > > perhaps being incorrect. The doc project does not have the source for > > the document but the issue shows up in our queue. I thought that we > > might help. > > Help is always appreciated. :-) > > As I already wrote, I will take care for the correct assignment of the > issues. At the end it will be one of the developers who has to provide > the documentation content so I will search for the right one. > > >> OTOH if anybody else wants to create a new DevGuide nobody will complain > >> against this (provided that its quality would be sufficient). We have no > >> commercial interest in the DevGuide. > > > > You know this might not be a bad idea. I will ask to see if any are > > interested. What with the contest, I do not expect a swift response but > > who knows. > > My personal opinion (and the one of Jürgen as well IIRC) is that we want > to hand over the DevGuide to the community. Jürgen might correct me > later if I'm wrong, currently he's on a business trip. > > This will still not change a lot as most of the content will still come > from the "core" developers but at least there will be a chance for > others to contribute and of course to translate. Let's hope for the best. > > Best regards, > Mathias >
When the time comes, please remember the documentation project as a resource. This is especially true if the source, or even part of it, for the current document is made available. The project's preferred license is PDL which you can check out at http://www.openoffice.org/project/www/license.html -- G. Roderick Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
