Tobias Krais wrote:
Hi Matthias,
Check if everything works with OOo 2.2. If it does, you're being hit by
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
(which won't be fixed. So you may have to brush up your knowledge of
classloaders (a somewhat obscure and tricky topic) to get your problem
fixed).
that's it! Thanks for the hint. I would like to add some notes to this
issue. Classpath is a common technique, used by many frameworks, e.g.
Spring. Due to this issue, it is not possible to use external frameworks
- and these might be extremely useful - without patching them (most
frameworks rely on classpath technology. Is this the design goal for
extensions? If I think of the future of OO: might this be a no-go
criteria for developers?
I can understand the reasons why the classpath was cleansed, but I am
not sure if this is the best way for OO's future.
And I think this is a point that should be mentioned in the developers
guide!
Your opinion is welcome!
mmh, i think the way we did it is correct and it is more a problem
(misuse, misunderstanding) of the other frameworks. But i agree that it
might be a problem of OO.org because of the popularity of these other
frameworks.
That's not nice and i have no good idea how we can solve it. But i don't
like the idea to move back to support this again.
Juergen
Greetings, Tobias
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
