thanks, I will keep apisix-* repo naming style the shared doc is a tech topic, the context of the project is in the mail list we discussed before,which title is [DISCUSS]Hope to add the following capabilities to APISIX. copy some topics here: ``` Hope to add the following capabilities to APISIX
1. Config APISIX with yaml; 2. Define the data structure to conform to the general behavior of the gateway; 3. Incremental update; Why do you want to do this? 1. In order to facilitate the integration of k8s, use yaml to define APISIX; 2. For easier synchronization across clusters; 3. Can be better adapted to multiple platforms (k8s, vm); ``` Sheng Wu <[email protected]> 于2020年7月25日周六 下午4:39写道： > wei jin <[email protected]> 于2020年7月25日周六 上午10:49写道： > > > Hello, community, > > I want to create a new project under APISIX, I have a few questions: > > > > 1. Are there any restrictions on project naming? Does the name have to > > contain the keyword `apisix`? > > > > I think in today's practice, INFRA keep apisix-* as the default repo naming > style. > If you want another name, we may need to reach the INFRA team, the > self-service platform requires this way AFAIK. > > And I want to second Ming Wen's question > > "Is this a newly developed project or a donation? What is the relationship > between this project and APISIX?" > The shared doc seems a tech topic only, still, it is not clear about the > context. > > > > 2. How many ways do we name the project? >
