is that the returned data structure is as you said at first?

this
```json
[
  {
    "name": "key-auth",
    "type":  "auth",
    "schema": {
     ....
    }
    ...other plugin meta_data
  },
 {
   ...
 }
]
```


刘曦冉 <[email protected]> 于2020年12月7日周一 下午1:23写道:

> Hi  Community:For the name of the API, zexuan recommended `
> /apisix/admin/plugins?all=true`, because
> > The definition of `plugin attributes` is taken too.
>
>
> it is fine for me and what do you think?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 2020-12-01 11:18:37, "Zexuan Luo" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >The definition of `plugin attributes` is taken too, see
> >
> https://github.com/apache/apisix/blob/9dfe697b644691509b55cd7ec58188b33dd3e792/conf/config-default.yaml#L245
> >
> >What about using ` /apisix/admin/plugins?all=true`?
> >
> >BTW, it would be better if we can avoid the verb in the REST API, to make
> >it less like RPC.
> >If the verb is inevitable, put it in the last part, like this:
> >/apisix/admin/plugins:list?all=true.
> >Therefore we can avoid conflict when we need to introduce
> >/apisix/admin/plugin/<plugin_name> API.
> >
> >YuanSheng Wang <[email protected]> 于2020年12月1日周二 上午10:38写道:
> >
> >> I think this is fine for us.
> >>
> >> API: */apisix/admin/plugins/list_with_attributes*
> >> Desc: return all the attributes of the plugin.
> >>
> >> Return value:
> >>
> >> ```json
> >> [
> >>   {
> >>     "name": "key-auth",
> >>     "type":  "auth",
> >>     "schema": {
> >>      ....
> >>     }
> >>     ...other plugin meta_data
> >>   },
> >>  {
> >>    ...
> >>  }
> >> ]
> >> ```
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 10:36 AM 刘曦冉 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks  for zexuan‘s  explanation which answered my question.
> >> > as for the name of the new api,
> >> > > How about this name?
> >> > /apisix/admin/plugins/list_all
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > agree, for 2.x is a good compromise.
> >> > we can add a TODO here, when we do a big version upgrade, we could
> >> > consider to  uses `/plugins` and query params to get all plugin
> >> information
> >> > and  specific plugin information.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 在 2020-12-01 09:18:19,"Zexuan Luo" <[email protected]> 写道:
> >> > >> plugin metadata includes
> >> > >name, version, type, priority, which is common to all plugins, and is
> >> used
> >> > >to describe the nature of the plugin
> >> > >
> >> > >The terminology of  'plugin metadata' is already taken by plugin
> level
> >> > >configuration. We should avoid redefinition of 'plugin metadata' and
> >> > define
> >> > >a new name for plugin info
> >> > >
> >> > >王三 <[email protected]> 于2020年11月30日周一 下午10:20写道:
> >> > >
> >> > >> I think metadata and schema are parallel things, plugin metadata
> >> > includes
> >> > >> name, version, type, priority, which is common to all plugins, and
> is
> >> > used
> >> > >> to describe the nature of the plugin.
> >> > >> The schema and consumer_schema are the plugin's schema, which
> defines
> >> > the
> >> > >> configuration parameters for generating a plugin instance.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Perhaps the above perception is slightly radical.
> >> > >> I prefer to think of the schema and consumer_schema as part of the
> >> > plugin‘s
> >> > >> metadata, except that some plugins have a null consumer_schema.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> 刘曦冉 <[email protected]> 于2020年11月30日周一 下午10:00写道:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > There are a few questions I'd like to confirm:
> >> > >> > 1、Is meta data only a part of plugin's information?
> >> > >> > 2、In v2.0, Manager-api and Admin-api are independent of each
> other,
> >> > >> > right?  After checking, the exist API listed by membphis are
> >> > admin-apis,
> >> > >> > and currently there are two exist APIs in manger-api
> >> > >> > `GET /apisix/admin/plugins` to get plugin names list
> >> > >> > `GET /apisix/admin/schema/plugins/{plugin_name}` to get specific
> >> > plugin's
> >> > >> > schema
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > 在 2020-11-30 20:30:27,"YuanSheng Wang" <[email protected]> 写道:
> >> > >> > >exist API list:
> >> > >> > > /apisix/admin/plugins/list
> >> > >> > > /apisix/admin/plugins/reload
> >> > >> > > /apisix/admin/plugins/{plugin_name}
> >> > >> > > /apisix/admin/plugin_metadata/{plugin_name}
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >How about this name?
> >> > >> > > /apisix/admin/plugins/list_all
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 7:43 PM Zexuan Luo <
> [email protected]
> >> >
> >> > >> > wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> We already have API for plugin_metadata and it is not related
> to
> >> > the
> >> > >> > plugin
> >> > >> > >> information. I am afraid there will be some confusion.
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> YuanSheng Wang <[email protected]> 于2020年11月30日周一 下午6:26写道:
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> > The idea is very good.
> >> > >> > >> > The response data format is fine to me too.
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >> > Just small changing(not important):
> >> > >> > >> > `GET /apisix/admin/plugins/meta_data`
> >> > >> > >> > change to
> >> > >> > >> > `GET /apisix/admin/plugins/metadata`
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 5:54 PM 刘曦冉 <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >> > > Hi  Community:
> >> > >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> > > This discussion originates from issue:
> >> > >> > >> > > https://github.com/apache/apisix-dashboard/issues/529
> >> > >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> > > Background
> >> > >> > >> > > Dashboard wants to optimize the UE of config the plugins.
> For
> >> > the
> >> > >> > >> plugins
> >> > >> > >> > > such as `key-auth` `prometheus` etc. user only need to
> >> > >> > enable/disable
> >> > >> > >> > them
> >> > >> > >> > > in route or service without any configurations. so it
> would
> >> be
> >> > >> > better
> >> > >> > >> > that
> >> > >> > >> > > only show switch for these plugins.
> >> > >> > >> > > When rendering the plugin page, the FE needs to know not
> only
> >> > the
> >> > >> > name
> >> > >> > >> of
> >> > >> > >> > > the plugins(which have already been returned by `GET
> >> > >> > >> > > /apisix/admin/plugins`), but also need to know the
> plugins'
> >> > schema
> >> > >> > >> which
> >> > >> > >> > is
> >> > >> > >> > > used to judge whether the plugin needs to be config
> >> > >> > >> > > Solution
> >> > >> > >> > > Refer to
> >> > >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/apisix-dashboard/issues/529#issuecomment-735641857
> >> > >> > >> > > It would be better to create a new API in manger-api,
> which
> >> is
> >> > >> used
> >> > >> > to
> >> > >> > >> > > return all the information of the plugins, the ideal data
> >> > >> structure
> >> > >> > is
> >> > >> > >> as
> >> > >> > >> > > follows:
> >> > >> > >> > > ```json
> >> > >> > >> > > [
> >> > >> > >> > >   {
> >> > >> > >> > >     "name": "key-auth",
> >> > >> > >> > >     "type":  "auth",
> >> > >> > >> > >     "schema": {
> >> > >> > >> > >      ....
> >> > >> > >> > >     }
> >> > >> > >> > >     ...other plugin meta_data
> >> > >> > >> > >   },
> >> > >> > >> > >  {
> >> > >> > >> > >    ...
> >> > >> > >> > >  }
> >> > >> > >> > > ]
> >> > >> > >> > > ```
> >> > >> > >> > > And for the API name
> >> > >> > >> > > Just follow the current convention:as `GET
> >> > /apisix/admin/plugins`
> >> > >> > has
> >> > >> > >> > > already in use for get all plugins names list, so the new
> >> name
> >> > >> > would be
> >> > >> > >> > > `GET /apisix/admin/plugins/meta_data`  to get all plugins
> >> > >> > informations
> >> > >> > >> > list.
> >> > >> > >> > > When we have a large version change: for a better Reatful
> >> way,
> >> > I
> >> > >> > perfer
> >> > >> > >> > > this way:
> >> > >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/apisix-dashboard/issues/849#issuecomment-735338561
> >> > >> > >> > > the name would be  `GET /api/version/plugins`
> >> > >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> > > What do you think? Looking forward to your comments and
> >> > >> suggestions.
> >> > >> > >> > > Thanks~!
> >> > >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> > > Best wishes
> >> > >> > >> > > Liuxiran
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >> > --
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >> > *MembPhis*
> >> > >> > >> > My GitHub: https://github.com/membphis
> >> > >> > >> > Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix
> >> > >> > >> >
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >--
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >*MembPhis*
> >> > >> > >My GitHub: https://github.com/membphis
> >> > >> > >Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> *MembPhis*
> >> My GitHub: https://github.com/membphis
> >> Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix
> >>
>

Reply via email to