I think there is a name convention in it. service_id is the id for service, so the id for plugin_conf is plugin_conf_id, as `/plugins` namespace is already used for other purpose.
YuanSheng Wang <[email protected]> 于2021年1月19日周二 下午2:40写道： > nice proposal for me. > > only one small point, how about the shorter one? `plugin_config_id` -> ` > plugin_id` > > ^_^ > > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:14 AM Zexuan Luo <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > - This idea is to reuse some common plugin configuration between routes. > > > > The solution contains several steps: > > 1. add namespace `/plugin_configs` > > Item in this namespace should have fields below: > > * id > > * name > > * plugins > > * create_time > > * update_time > > (Note: the arguments in plugins should pass the schema check.) > > > > 2. bind the plugin_config in route via plugin_config_id > > - 3. Like merging service, we merge the plugin_config into route when the > > route is hit. Note: should change route's modifiedIndex when > plugin_config > > changed. When plugin_config and route has the same plugin, the one from > > plugin_config will override the one in the route. > > > > What about your opinions? > > > > > -- > > *MembPhis* > My GitHub: https://github.com/membphis > Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix >
