nice！ +1 Chao Zhang <zchao1...@gmail.com>于2021年3月17日 周三下午3:12写道：
> Why not just use one option, "Preserve Client Host”, by default it’s > closed, which means the Host header will be rewrite to the Upstream host; > When it’s opened, the client host will inherited > when proxying to upstream. > > Chao Zhang > https://github.com/tokers > > On March 17, 2021 at 2:49:50 PM, Ming Wen (wenm...@apache.org) wrote: > > I think there should be only two options: preserve and use upstream host, > the default is the latter > > JunXu Chen <chenju...@apache.org>于2021年3月17日 周三下午1:46写道： > > > Hi, Community, > > > > Currently we use `pass_host` to mark how to process the upstream > request’s > > Host header. > > > > It can be one of [`pass`, `node`, `rewrite`], the default option is > `pass`. > > pass: Pass the client's host transparently to the upstream; > > node: Use the host configured in the node of upstream; > > rewrite: Use the value of the configuration upstream_host. > > > > Referring to nginx(proxy_pass), tyk and kong, we found that their default > > behavior is not to preserve the client's request Host, but to set the > > upstream request’s Host header to the hostname specified in the > > upstream(service) by default. > > > > issues: > > > > 1. `pass_host` is not easy to understand, I think we could use > > `preserve_host` or `preserve_host_header` instead. > > > > 2. We should also be the same behavior as nginx, tyk and kong, not > preserve > > the client's request Host by default if the hostname has been specified > in > > the upstream. > > > > What is your opinion? Thanks! > > > -- > Thanks, > Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair > Twitter: _WenMing > -- Thanks, Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair Twitter: _WenMing
