> I think the first type is not necessarily as we already have dns
discovery.
>
> We can use:
>
> ```
> {
>     "upstream_host": "httpbin.org",
>     "type":"roundrobin",
>     "service_name": "httpbin.org"
>     ...
> }
> ```

I do not think this is the best way.
It was designed like this before there was no `upstream.pass_host` field.
Although it works, it is not user-friendly.

When modifying it later, two places need to be modified. For users, both
the upstream address and host should be maintained in one place.

For case 1, I think this style is easy to understand and maintain.
(if he/she want to change the address, just update `upstream_host`)

```1
{
    "upstream_host": "httpbin.org"  # send request to `httpbin.org` with
same host name
}
```


On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:20 PM Zexuan Luo <spacewan...@apache.org> wrote:

> I think the first type is not necessarily as we already have dns discovery.
>
> We can use:
>
> ```
> {
>     "upstream_host": "httpbin.org",
>     "type":"roundrobin",
>     "service_name": "httpbin.org"
>     ...
> }
> ```
>
> YuanSheng Wang <membp...@apache.org> 于2021年3月19日周五 下午6:55写道:
> >
> > I think we can make the `upstream.node` and `upstream.type` optional.
> > We can support those three ways:
> >
> > ```1
> > {
> >     "upstream_host": "httpbin.org"  # send request to `httpbin.org` with
> > same host name
> > }
> > ```
> >
> > or
> >
> >
> > ```2
> > {
> >     "upstream_host": "httpbin.org",
> >     "type":"roundrobin",
> >     "nodes": {"foo.com:80": 100},  # send request to `foo.com` with host
> > name `httpbin.org`
> > }
> > ```
> >
> > or
> >
> > ```3
> > {
> >     "type":"roundrobin",
> >     "nodes": {"foo.com:80": 100},  # send request to `foo.com` with
> current
> > request host
> > }
> > ```
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 1:07 PM Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > And we need a plan to do some changes on APISIX IMO, anyone would like
> to
> > > take this issue?
> > >
> > > Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org>于2021年3月18日 周四下午1:06写道:
> > >
> > > > Yep
> > > >
> > > > Chao Zhang <zchao1...@gmail.com>于2021年3月18日 周四下午1:04写道:
> > > >
> > > >> I think the point that put forward by Ju is same with what I
> proposed :)
> > > >>
> > > >> Chao Zhang
> > > >> https://github.com/tokers
> > > >>
> > > >> On March 18, 2021 at 11:55:14 AM, Ming Wen (wenm...@apache.org)
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> chao zhang's idea is good for me.
> > > >> what do you think?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair
> > > >> Twitter: _WenMing
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年3月18日周四 上午11:49写道:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Any conclusion and plan here?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > There has 1 related PR[1].
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/apisix-dashboard/pull/1603
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Best Regards!
> > > >> > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年3月17日周三 下午11:22写道:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > yep, after going through Tyk & Kong, I would agree to use
> > > >> `preserve_host`
> > > >> > > to replace the current 3 opinions.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Best Regards!
> > > >> > > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Ming Wen <wenm...@apache.org> 于2021年3月17日周三 下午5:44写道:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> nice!
> > > >> > >> +1
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Chao Zhang <zchao1...@gmail.com>于2021年3月17日 周三下午3:12写道:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> > Why not just use one option, "Preserve Client Host”, by
> default
> > > >> it’s
> > > >> > >> > closed, which means the Host header will be rewrite to the
> > > Upstream
> > > >> > >> host;
> > > >> > >> > When it’s opened, the client host will inherited
> > > >> > >> > when proxying to upstream.
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > Chao Zhang
> > > >> > >> > https://github.com/tokers
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > On March 17, 2021 at 2:49:50 PM, Ming Wen (
> wenm...@apache.org)
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > I think there should be only two options: preserve and use
> > > upstream
> > > >> > >> host,
> > > >> > >> > the default is the latter
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > JunXu Chen <chenju...@apache.org>于2021年3月17日 周三下午1:46写道:
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > Hi, Community,
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > Currently we use `pass_host` to mark how to process the
> > > upstream
> > > >> > >> > request’s
> > > >> > >> > > Host header.
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > It can be one of [`pass`, `node`, `rewrite`], the default
> > > option
> > > >> is
> > > >> > >> > `pass`.
> > > >> > >> > > pass: Pass the client's host transparently to the upstream;
> > > >> > >> > > node: Use the host configured in the node of upstream;
> > > >> > >> > > rewrite: Use the value of the configuration upstream_host.
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > Referring to nginx(proxy_pass), tyk and kong, we found that
> > > their
> > > >> > >> default
> > > >> > >> > > behavior is not to preserve the client's request Host, but
> to
> > > set
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > >> > > upstream request’s Host header to the hostname specified
> in the
> > > >> > >> > > upstream(service) by default.
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > issues:
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > 1. `pass_host` is not easy to understand, I think we could
> use
> > > >> > >> > > `preserve_host` or `preserve_host_header` instead.
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > 2. We should also be the same behavior as nginx, tyk and
> kong,
> > > >> not
> > > >> > >> > preserve
> > > >> > >> > > the client's request Host by default if the hostname has
> been
> > > >> > >> specified
> > > >> > >> > in
> > > >> > >> > > the upstream.
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > What is your opinion? Thanks!
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > --
> > > >> > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > >> > Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair
> > > >> > >> > Twitter: _WenMing
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> --
> > > >> > >> Thanks,
> > > >> > >> Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair
> > > >> > >> Twitter: _WenMing
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > > --
> > > > 来自 琚致远
> > > >
> > > --
> > > 来自 琚致远
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > *MembPhis*
> > My GitHub: https://github.com/membphis
> > Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix
>


-- 

*MembPhis*
My GitHub: https://github.com/membphis
Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix

Reply via email to