> Before adding the "stale" label, I prefer there is a comment from a real person to ask the status of the issue first.
I agree with this opinion. BTW, it seems that our Markdown Link Checker is coming back :) Best Regards! @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan> Willem Jiang <[email protected]> 于2021年4月22日周四 下午7:35写道： > Before adding the "stale" label, I prefer there is a comment from a > real person to ask the status of the issue first. > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 3:29 PM Chao Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, Justin > > > > Thanks for your recommendation, then I think we may add the "stale" > > label for issues lacking interactions for more than a long while. > > > > Best regards > > Chao Zhang > > > > https://github.com/tokers > > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 3:03 PM Justin Mclean <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > What about adding the automatic closing stale issue? > > > > > > I would recommend against doing this. If you have stale issues it is > most likely because you haven’t interacted with the contributor or a > committer has not addressed it. And even if that’s no the case, auto > closing an issue that someone may care about tells they they are not > welcome on this project and are likely to stop contributing. Remember this > is different to a corporate environment and your contributors are > volunteers. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Justin >
