Hi, Any further discussion on this mail? I'm going to list all APIs and check which part we should modify.
Best Regards! @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan> Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年7月22日周四 下午2:47写道: > I would prefer relying on Status Code instead of `code` (actually it's a > manual logical and extendable code). > > Why not list all API cases then have a choice? > > Best Regards! > @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan> > > > Ming Wen <wenm...@apache.org> 于2021年7月22日周四 下午12:36写道: > >> please give an example about i18n for a better understanding >> >> Thanks, >> Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair >> Twitter: _WenMing >> >> >> JunXu Chen <chenju...@apache.org> 于2021年7月22日周四 上午11:36写道: >> >> > Agree +1 >> > >> > >> > I think we still need to keep the `code` field. >> > >> > The FE needs to implement i18n according to it. >> > >> > Unless `message` is semantic and can be used as a key of i18n. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 00:02, Ming Wen <wenm...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > > I don't think the `code` filed is useful, HTTP response code is >> enough. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair >> > > Twitter: _WenMing >> > > >> > > >> > > Peter Zhu <sta...@apache.org> 于2021年7月21日周三 下午11:18写道: >> > > >> > > > Agree +1. >> > > > And I think we should maintain the `code` filed and maintain the >> doc of >> > > > API. >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >