Agree, +1 to drop the support of Tengine

Zhiyuan Ju <juzhiy...@apache.org> 于2021年12月21日周二 10:47写道:

> > In the future, we may only support OpenResty 1.19+.
> > We don't have contributors who are familiar enough with Tengine.
>
> Agree with Zexuan and Zeping's thoughts on this, +1 to drop the support of
> Tengine.
>
> Best Regards!
> @ Zhiyuan Ju <https://github.com/juzhiyuan>
>
>
> Tsangleslie <leslie.ts...@icloud.com.invalid> 于2021年12月20日周一 23:22写道:
>
> > Agreed.
> > One vote for dropping support for Tengine.
> >
> >
> > Leslie Tsang
> > leslie.ts...@icloud.com
> >
> > > On 20 Dec 2021, at 9:24 PM, Zeping Bai <bzp2...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, Zexuan.
> > > I fully agree with dropping this support. Continuing to support it does
> > > us little good and makes it more difficult to maintain. Also, according
> > > to you, we don't have contributors who are familiar enough with
> > > Tengine. So I think it's time to give up on it.
> > >
> > > Best regards!
> > > Zeping Bai  @bzp2010
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Zexuan Luo <spacewan...@apache.org> 于2021年12月20日周一 21:13写道:
> > >
> > >> As OpenResty is going to release 1.21.4, it is time to consider
> > >> dropping the support of Tengine.
> > >>
> > >> Although Tengine is still maintained (a bugfix is just merged this
> > >> month), IMHO there will be some benefits if we can drop the support of
> > >> Tengine:
> > >> 1. The latest Tengine is still based on Nginx 1.18.0, which is
> > >> released years ago.
> > >> 2. The Tengine support of APISIX is contributed by a contributor who
> > >> is no longer active. The maintainers don't have much experience to
> > >> work with Tengine.
> > >> 3. Some feature of Tengine, like Dubbo proxy, is already supported in
> > >> apisix-base.
> > >> 4. Some feature of APISIX requires apisix-base, which is not supported
> > >> by Tengine.
> > >>
> > >> By dropping the support of Tengine, we can remove extra CI job and
> > >> version check, make the code simpler. In the future, we may only
> > >> support OpenResty 1.19+.
> > >>
> > >> What about your opinion?
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to