+1 (non-binding)

Best Regards
guohao.wang

On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 at 15:23, wei liu <monkeydluffy6...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I checked:
> 1. All links are correct.
> 2. Checksum and signature are correct.
> 3. LICENSE and NOTICE files exist.
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 3:10 PM Jinhua Luo <luajit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Xin Rong <alins...@apache.org> 于2023年7月19日周三 23:48写道:
> > >
> > > Hello, Community,
> > >
> > > This is a call for the vote to release Apache APISIX version
> > >
> > > Release notes:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/apisix/blob/release/3.2/CHANGELOG.md#322
> > >
> > > The release candidates:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/apisix/3.2.2/
> > >
> > > Release Commit ID:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/apisix/commit/77704832
> > >
> > > Keys to verify the Release Candidate:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/apisix/KEYS
> > >
> > > Steps to validating the release:
> > >
> > > 1. Download the release
> > >
> > > wget
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/apisix/3.2.2/apache-apisix-3.2.2-src.tgz
> > >
> > > 2. Checksums and signatures
> > >
> > > wget https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/apisix/KEYS
> > >
> > > wget
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/apisix/3.2.2/apache-apisix-3.2.2-src.tgz.asc
> > >
> > > wget
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/apisix/3.2.2/apache-apisix-3.2.2-src.tgz.sha512
> > >
> > > gpg --import KEYS
> > >
> > > shasum -c apache-apisix-3.2.2-src.tgz.sha512
> > >
> > > gpg --verify apache-apisix-3.2.2-src.tgz.asc apache-apisix-3.2.2-src.tgz
> > >
> > > 3. Unzip and Check files
> > >
> > > tar zxvf apache-apisix-3.2.2-src.tgz
> > >
> > > 4. Build Apache APISIX:
> > >
> > >
> > https://github.com/apache/apisix/blob/release/3.2/docs/en/latest/building-apisix.md#building-apisix-from-source
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> > > votes are reached.
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >

Reply via email to