On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 12:59:06PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > To me, all of this speaks in favour of creating /another/ library for > > > such not-sctrictly-portability stuff, and slowly moving the generic bits > > > out of APR. For all I care this could mean splitting APR into a core and > > > utility library, but keeping them conceptually together. > > > > > > How much sense that makes is another matter. > > > > I'm fine with that. > > Same here.
Woah, woah, woah... did we just agree? ;-) -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
