> On 6 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> >   An alternate way to fix this problem is to explicitly break the bucket
> >   type out of the "type" structure in ap_bucketi and represent each bucket
> >   type with an enum.
> 
> We have been over this.  This was part of the original design for the
> buckets.  Using the types allows the buckets to be much more extensible,
> plus it shrinks the bucket structure, and it puts all of the bucket
> declarations in the same place in memory.
> 
> Ryan
> 

Yes, I agree. I only mentioned it as an aid to understanding the problem.

Bill

Reply via email to