> From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 5:14 PM
> > Then the header name at the very least needs to change.  As it is now, if
> > we install Apache on a machine that already has sdbm, we will break things
> > horribly.
> 
> Well, that's always been the case :-)
> 
> Hmm. I don't think that I'd have a problem renaming SDBM entry points and
> the header to apr_sdbm. I'll go put a line into the STATUS file for voting
> input.

apr_ prefixes get a +1 here :-)

Reply via email to