> From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 5:14 PM > > Then the header name at the very least needs to change. As it is now, if > > we install Apache on a machine that already has sdbm, we will break things > > horribly. > > Well, that's always been the case :-) > > Hmm. I don't think that I'd have a problem renaming SDBM entry points and > the header to apr_sdbm. I'll go put a line into the STATUS file for voting > input.
apr_ prefixes get a +1 here :-)
