--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Can't do that. :-) We already have ap_brigade_split. I would call it > ap_brigade_split_offset or something like that.
Okay. ap_brigade_split_offset() it is. I think that's a more clear name anyway. But again, what about _copy_any()? Should it be ap_brigade_copy()? Also, I was never 100% decided about one aspect of the bucket copy API, which is the return value... should the ap_bucket* be the actual return value, or should it be an apr_status_t? I ended up going with the apr_status_t return value to accomodate APR_ENOTIMPL. Do people agree with that decision? On the other hand, it seems that ap_brigade_copy() ought to return an ap_bucket_brigade* to match ap_brigade_split() and ap_brigade_split_offset(). Yes? --Cliff __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/
