No ... I was waffling, and went back to my note discussing this on dev-apr before I choose. We had discussed an apr-iconv, not an apr-xlate, so I decided on apr-iconv. That is, after all, the specific package we are patching/redistributing.
Bill > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Behlendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 2:36 PM > To: William A. Rowe, Jr. > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: New cvs repository, please? > > > > (cc'ing [email protected]) > > Did you want an apr-iconv *and* apr-xlate directory/module? > > Brian > > On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > Whomever, > > > > could you create the apr group a root cvs repository apr-xlate > > with the usual apr permissions? We are moving the apr/xlate/iconv > > branch into that repository, to save users from having to check out > > a horribly nasty sized tree if they don't need it. > > > > rbb, gstein and wrowe all assent, with no objections. > > > > Bill > > > > -- > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > -=-=-=-=-=-= > CollabNet | open source | do what's right | > now hiring > > >
