Yes, we have libaprutil.* on Unix (.a, .so, .la) Cheers, -g
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 05:48:47PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > libaprutil.so? This will become libaprutil.dll then. Didn't matter, > since the entire scope of the system was being overhauled, including > library names. As long as they have a lib prefix on unix, they need > to share that prefix on win32. > > Thanks for the observation, though! > > Bill > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 3:58 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr-util aprutil.def > > > > > > Is it normal to put a dash into libraries, DLLs? I've never seen one. > > > > We certainly don't include it in the Unix builds. The dash in > > "apr-util" is > > an aspect of the setup on locus, rather than a specific intention. > > > > Cheers, > > -g > > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 05:55:32PM -0000, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > wrowe 00/12/12 09:55:31 > > > > > > Modified: . aprutil.def > > > Log: > > > Wrong place for a slash :-/ > > > > > > Revision Changes Path > > > 1.5 +2 -2 apr-util/aprutil.def > > > > > > Index: aprutil.def > > > > > =================================================================== > > > RCS file: /home/cvs/apr-util/aprutil.def,v > > > retrieving revision 1.4 > > > retrieving revision 1.5 > > > diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 > > > --- aprutil.def 2000/12/12 17:43:32 1.4 > > > +++ aprutil.def 2000/12/12 17:55:29 1.5 > > > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > > > -; apr-util.def : > > > +; aprutil.def : > > > > > > -LIBRARY aprutil > > > +LIBRARY apr-util > > > DESCRIPTION '' > > > > > > EXPORTS > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/ > > -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
