On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Mo DeJong wrote: > I agree with RTFM! as much the next guy, but it seems > like users might be better off if we renamed > the buildconf file to autogen.sh. Lots of > other projects use a script named autogen.sh. > I am not sure it is a "standard", but why > be different for no reason?
And as you point out in a later email, the behaviour of the
various autogen.sh is different in each project.
It is not a standard, hence your proposal is flawed.
- Sascha
