So will people really kick and scream if I change the library built in apr-util to a .a instead of a .la? This will then allow Apache to build on BeOS (tested) (and might also get OS/2 working - Brian?) It also brings apr-util in line with APR's build strategy...
david ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "APR Development List" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 2:00 PM Subject: libaprutil > Why are we building this as a shared library when apr gets built as a > static? I ask as the inclusion of libaprutil.so is what's causing me grief > at present in getting a built/runnable httpd. > > To give a bit more background the library is built but BeOS seems to have > some strange problems actually using shared libraries that I'm fighting with > at present. Once I've won the fight then this may not be an issue, but it > does seem a bit strange that presently apr is static but aprutil is shared. > > david > >
