> > > I guess you are referring to libc 5.x.x systems? There are > > > still kernels around (2.0.x, early 2.2.x possibly) which > > > don't support TCP_CORK, so I think we should not simply > > > presume that TCP_CORK works. > > > > > > Would anyone mind, if the *linux* portion of the case > > > statement would egrep linux/socket.h for TCP_CORK? > > > > Sounds good. Or, we could just check to see if we are on linux and > > sendfile is defined. Is that a good enough check? > > Was TCP_CORK and sendfile introduced at the same time? I > don't know.. anyway, I've committed the small egrep addition > which should properly exclude older kernels (tested on a 2.0 > system).
I don't know either. I would kind of hope so, plus in the old code, we were searching for sendfile() and if that was defined, we assumed TCP_CORK was defined or at least available. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
