the apr_fileinfo_t changes sound like they're necessary and since they break the API a freeze doesn't sound like a good idea...
-dean On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > APR's development cycle is currently very much tied to Apache 2.0's cycle, > for better or worse. Apache 2.0 is about to hit beta, and I would believe > that means that APR is going to go beta at the same time. > > Because we want to hit beta ASAP, I would like to ask that APR is in > feature freeze until we actually roll the beta. This does not mean that > the APR_DECLARE patches will stop being applied, because those are 100% > bug fixes for platforms like Windows. > > Thoughts? > > Ryan > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 406 29th St. > San Francisco, CA 94131 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >
